Ever burned valuable time chasing down what feels like endless versions of 42 CFR Part 2? No more! Bookmark this for your one-stop place to go for copies of every single Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) and Final Rule for 42 CFR Part 2, starting with the very first proposal in 1974! Whether you’re a compliance officer, privacy lawyer, or just a regs nerd who loves immediate access to the rules you need, this list has you covered. Bookmark it, share it, and breathe easy knowing you’ll never again waste hours digging through archives. You’re welcome. 😉
Since TEFCA went live in December 2023, eight (8) organizations have been designated as Qualified Health Information Networks (QHINs). Each QHIN is a large information network that represents up to hundreds of HINs, health systems, public health agencies, payers, and IT vendors. Epic and Carequality recently announced that they would align their frameworks with TEFCA. TEFCA’s growth will be further supported by regulatory measures to incentivize network participation, such as the Information Blocking Rule.
The landscape of health IT regulation just took another significant leap forward. In the final days of 2024, federal regulators dropped two game-changing rules—HIT-2 and HTI-3—adding to the foundation set by HTI-1. Together, these regulations are reshaping how healthcare organizations approach interoperability, data sharing, and compliance in an era of rapidly evolving technology. But what do these latest rules really mean for healthcare providers, developers, and patients? Let’s break down the impact and key takeaways you need to know.
The FTC has finalized significant changes to the Health Breach Notification Rule (HBNR), a regulation originally designed to ensure that personal health records (PHRs) and similar digital health platforms notify consumers in the event of a data breach. These updates clarify the rule’s applicability to technologies outside the scope of HIPAA and impose stricter notification and transparency requirements on companies handling sensitive health data. The amendments also carry broad implications for HIEs and HINs, which are at the forefront of data interoperability and patient information sharing.
The New Jersey Data Privacy Act (NJDPA) was enacted on January 16, 2024. Although PHI collected by a HIPAA CE or BA is excluded from the NJDPA HIPAA CEs and BAs are NOT wholly excluded from compliance with the NJDPA. Also, HHS’ recent problematic interpretation that IP addresses collected by a healthcare provider’s website may be PHI adds even more complexity in interpreting the NJDPA.
After OCR created a Morton’s Fork for hospitals and health systems by publishing its HIPAA Guidance on the Use of Online Tracking Technologies, the American Hospital Association initially stayed out of the fray. Not any more. In its letter dated May 22, 2023, AHA makes its case to HHS as to why OCR’s Online Tracking Guidance should be suspended or amended.
SAMHSA finally fulfilled its duty under the CARES Act & releases a Proposed Rule “Confidentiality of Substance Use Disorder (SUD) Patient Records” amending the Part 2 rules in line with the CARES Act’s requirements. This is the 4th overhaul of the Part 2 Rule in 5 years…
Seasons Greetings to all of our readers! First, we want to wish you and yours a holiday season filled with health, happiness and hope! We also want to thank you all for continuing to make Legal HIE such a popular and highly visited blog! It puts a smile on our face seeing so many of you enjoying our posts and returning to our site often!
As stockings are being hung by chimneys with care, we want to make sure you know that Legal HIE’s stockings are absolutely stuffed to the brim with tremendous tools, sample forms, polices and turn-key solutions that can help your organization stay on top of the most pressing compliance challenges, and ever-changing healthcare regulatory landscape. 2021 promises to be a year with many new and final regulations going into effect, and being released. The Legal HIE compliance library was created specifically for this purpose – to help busy and overwhelmed compliance officers and attorneys keep up with these changes by offering turn-key samples and solutions as a solid starting point.
Late last week, two new proposed rules were released which will affect the exchange of health information and HIPAA, among other things. The CMS and OCR proposed rules come in at over 347 and 357 pages respectively – so that’s a lot of meat to digest! At a high level, the CMS Proposed Rule aims to “improve the electronic exchange of health care data among payers, providers, and patients,” and “streamline processes related to prior authorization to reduce burden on providers and patients.” The OCR proposed changes to HIPAA take a bite out of patient access, minimum necessary, the HIPAA NPP and more . . .
At the last hour, CMS extended the deadline for publishing much anticipated changes to the Stark Law. Originally expected for publication this past August, CMS extended the deadline to August 2021, noting that “… we are still working through the complexity of the issues raised by comments received on the proposed rule and therefore we are not able to meet the announced publication target date.” Together with the OIG’s counterpart rule, the proposed rules contain the potential for significant modernization of the Stark Law and Anti-kickback Statute as part of the “Regulatory Spring to Coordinated Care” as well as increased alignment and coordination between the two sets of laws.
Yesterday, the period for public comment on the FTC’s Health Breach Notification Rule closed. The FTC’s Health Breach Notification Rule requires vendors of PHRs and PHR-related entities to notify the FTC if they experience a breach of security involving unsecured health information. Another area of change to Breach Notification is arising out of the CARES Act which was was enacted into law on March 27, 2020 and is making significant changes 42 C.F.R. Part 2. Among other changes that the CARES Act is introducing, it creates an entirely new obligation on Part 2 providers to notify SAMHSA of uses and disclosures of Part 2 data in any manner not authorized under Part 2! To date, 42 CFR Part 2 did NOT include an independent obligation to report or notify any agency (i.e., SAMHSA or HHS) of any use or disclosure of Part 2 information which was in violation of 42 CFR Part 2.
The Exposure Notification Privacy Act (“ENPA”) was introduced in the Senate on June 1 in an effort to regulate the growth of contact tracing applications and similar automated notification tracking. The ENPA aims to regulate websites, apps and similar services...
As part of its comprehensive COVID-19 response, Congress quietly passed through changes to the federal drug and alcohol confidentiality framework known as “Part 2” under the CARES Act, enacted on March 27. One of the more underreported components of the CARES Act, the changes do not completely overhaul the Part 2 regulations, however, they relax several restrictions that health care providers have struggled with, particularly in the electronic exchange and electronic health records (“EHR”) context (the “CARES Act Changes”).
On Friday, April 24th, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) of HHS published a Proposed Rule to amend the civil monetary penalties (CMP) rules to incorporate new authorities for investigating and assessing monetary penalties for Information Blocking violations.
Today, ONC announced that it will exercise its discretion in enforcing all new requirements under its Cures Act Final Rule which have compliance dates and time frames until 3 months after each such date identified in the Final Rule. The ONC Final Rule is scheduled to be published on May 1, 2020 in the Federal Register. The ONC has developed an “Enforcement Discretion Dates and Time frames” chart which indicates that the Part 170 Information Blocking provisions will have a compliance Enforcement Discretion Date of February 1, 2021.